I have since done my peer review and had a peer review my social space and how to instructions for Task 2. I was very grateful that 6 different people reviewed my submission as there was a variety of positive and constructive feedback that I used to alter my web page, blog and how to instructions.
I think that the use of a peer review system for a task like this is extremely useful and valued all of the feedback I received.
I am quite interested on both people's opinions and the statistics on the benefits of the use of technology in the classroom as it is such a widely debated topic and because technology is so evident in classrooms nowadays. I found pages 101-103 in
Meaningful Learning with Technology (Herrington & Parker, 2014) very useful for a classroom setting. They begin to discuss 'Things to Conside'r in regards to writing styles in online communication.
Firstly, I found the definition of 'meaningfully participate in conversations' handy in creating a base idea in my head for this topic. The definition stated that students must be able to "interpret messages, consider appropriate responses and construct coherent replies (pg. 101). This got me thinking on the sorts of posts/comments I see on my facebook feed to use it as an example. I know that facebook has no means of education value, however, it does show that kinds of conversations and responses given by people. Such things include 'yep, agreed, i reckon, ok, and the abbreviated lingo that I don't even know what half of it means. Figure 5.5 on page 102 of the text, shows a list of questions that can used to provoke meaningful conversations among participants in an online discussion forum.
I found the Things to Consider helpful in 2 ways. First, for myself as now that I am actively thinking about this, I can see I do not engage in meaningfully conversation over text or the internet in most instances. So for myself, I want to make sure I am consciously writing in a way that comes under the above definition.
Second, for my future teaching. As the book states, students do not usually contribute to meaningful conversations as they are too busy memorising information or taking notes on what the teacher is saying. I want to create a classroom environment where students are active and interactive. This is what I think provides the best form of learning. I can see that there are online tools that can be used within the classroom to assist with this. One is called
'Knowledge Forum' - which is, "... a knowledge-building environment that supports the collaboration process as users create and continue to improve ideas rather than simply complete tasks" (pg. 134).
 |
| Knowledge Forum Screenshot from the Products webpage. |
This is the sort of tools that I would like to use in my classroom rather than simply handing out worksheets for students to research the first answer that google gives them. Now that I have been made of aware of this particular tool, I am going to research other online tools that are available for use in the classroom for my future teaching.
I am glad that I read this chapter of the text before I completed my peer reviews, as it highlighted a few aspects for me in regards to effective communication in a setting where you are not face-to-face. This was the case with our reviews which were done solely over the internet and on a designated system. I found that after reading about meaningfully conversations, I could structure my review to provide this form of communication in both positive and constructive feedback and hopefully it helped me in writing constructive feedback that did not seem rude or offensive.
I enjoyed carrying out this task and feel that I have learnt a lot not only about Google Communities (the technology I used for my social space), but also a lot in regards to how I can use technology and the internet to provide my students with the best possible learning experience.
One things for sure, I will also refer back to this book!